Subject	All else equal, an NA will be cheaper to maintain, no doubt.
Posted by	zellamay on June 26, 2012 at 3:43 PM
	This message has been viewed 201 times.
In Reply To	TT vs. NA Reliability posted by ZRoTTyZ on June 26, 2012 at 01:34 PM
Message	That's not to disagree with previous posts. The main diff is a wise buy. .... Let me add this: When my NA started needing more maintenance, at about 80k, like an expensive A/C part, I started thinking: most of the stuff I'll need to replace, (tires, shocks, susp. parts, a/c parts, etc ...... ) will cost the same whether it's NA or TT, so why would I want to put a lot of money in the NA? I bought a TT and never looked back.
Follow Ups	TT vs. NA Reliability - ZRoTTyZ 13:34:22 06/26/12 100% depends on the individual car at this point. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 13:41:13 06/26/12 Re: 100% depends on the individual owner care. (n/m) - njz 14:05:32 06/26/12 All else equal, an NA will be cheaper to maintain, no doubt. - zellamay 15:43:30 06/26/12 I got to that point, decided to replace all the broken NA - Red Hawk (CO) 15:48:20 06/26/12 My NA was stolen around 8 years ago... - CameronSF 15:55:39 06/26/12 I've always wondered what happens to stolen Z's... - samsung-Z [Houston] 20:15:52 06/26/12 It all comes down to maintenance - RobZ32 10:46:07 06/27/12 Funny with stolen Z's - KA8 13:14:33 06/28/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.